AMID significant controversy, the U.S. FDA on Monday approved the drug aducanumab for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), ignoring the recommendation by its own advisory panel to reject the drug. Aducanumab was fast-tracked for approval, a process reserved for drugs that provide a meaningful advantage over existing treatments for a serious or life-threatening illness. However, under this process, the FDA will require its manufacturer, Biogen, to conduct a new randomized, controlled clinical trial to verify the drug’s benefit. In a release, the FDA agency said if the drug fails to show clinical benefit in this trial it has the option to withdraw its approval. Aducanumab’s approval marks the first new treatment approved for Alzheimer’s since 2003 and is the first to target beta-amyloid, the hallmark pathology of the disease. In November, the Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee voted 8 to 1 against approving the drug because, based on clinical trial results, evidence of efficacy was not strong enough. Two other members said they were uncertain on the issue of efficacy. The FDA noted that the approval was based on three separate double-blind, randomized studies representing 3,382 Alzheimer’s patients. Those receiving the active drug, the FDA said, showed significant reduction of beta amyloid plaque, while those in the control group had no reduction in amyloid. Alzheimer’s is a devastating illness that can have a profound impact on the lives of people diagnosed with the disease as well as their loved ones, said Patrizia Cavazzoni, MD, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “Currently available therapies only treat symptoms of the disease; this treatment option is the first therapy to target and affect the underlying disease process of Alzheimer’s,” she added. The road to approval has been extremely rocky for aducanumab, an anti-amyloid-beta human monoclonal antibody, previously known as BIIB037. Two phase III trials were scrapped in March 2019 because of poor interim results. At the time, Biogen said aducanumab was unlikely to meet its primary goals. However, in an about-face seven months later, Biogen and Eisai announced that a new analysis showed the drug met its goal, including cognition and function. However, one year later, a majority of the members of the FDA’s advisory panel were against the drug’s approval. Details of that decision were published online March 30 in JAMA. Three of the committee members wrote that results from the drug’s only large clinical trial fell short. Groups such as Public Citizen’s Health Research Group not only agree with the authors, they also criticized the FDA for its collaboration with the drug’s manufacturers on briefing documents and more. The Alzheimer’s Association has been a proponent of the drug throughout its development. The organization previously noted in a statement that a decision to approve “would be historic” because it would make aducanumab “the first drug to slow Alzheimer’s disease” and would mark the beginning of a new future of treatments. Kristen Clifford, chief program officer for the Alzheimer’s Association, said that approval would be considered a “victory” for patients and for the field overall. “For individuals who would potentially be eligible for the treatment, this drug could mean more quality time. Slowing decline, particularly in early diagnosis, could add weeks or months or maybe even years of active life,” Clifford said. Clifford noted that approval of this type of drug would also underscore the importance of early detection for Alzheimer’s. “This treatment would encourage earlier diagnosis of the disease,” she said. As the antibody treatment works by clearing toxic amyloid proteins from brain tissue, patients with late stage Alzheimer’s disease are unlikely to benefit. (SD-Agencies) | 